Texas X Riders

Main Area => General Discussion => Topic started by: rbrown on September 24, 2007, 09:58:18 AM

Title: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: rbrown on September 24, 2007, 09:58:18 AM
There was a front page article titled "Riders Divided About Helmet Proposal" in today's FW Star Telegram that was actually fairly balanced and thought everyone might be interested.

Here's the link: http://www.star-telegram.com/state_news/story/245351.html (http://www.star-telegram.com/state_news/story/245351.html)
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: b-rad on September 24, 2007, 10:15:29 AM
Is it a really short article, or am I missing something?   ???
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: rbrown on September 24, 2007, 10:18:29 AM
The article in the paper is much more in-depth. They severely shortened it for online viewing. I think it's worth 50 cents to pick up.
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: solitary-man on September 24, 2007, 10:44:19 AM
I think the law is good like it is. I choose to wear one whenever on the bike, just my thing. What I am interested in changing is a law against people talking on cell phone while driving. O0
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: White Wolf on September 24, 2007, 10:45:22 AM
http://www.star-telegram.com/state_news/story/245349.html

Looks like the full article.
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: rbrown on September 24, 2007, 11:15:50 AM
That's the full article but it doesn't have the fatality graphic that is in the paper. Thanks for posting the full one. I'm just excited that motorcycle safety is getting press since maybe it will wake some cagers up. If you look at some of the specific Ft. Worth fatalities then I don't see anything about a car running out in front of the bike. The media as a whole could do a lot better in making people aware that the majority of accidents that they call lost control are really due to cars pulling out in front of bikes.
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: murray_61 on September 24, 2007, 06:47:01 PM
That's the full article but it doesn't have the fatality graphic that is in the paper. Thanks for posting the full one. I'm just excited that motorcycle safety is getting press since maybe it will wake some cagers up. If you look at some of the specific Ft. Worth fatalities then I don't see anything about a car running out in front of the bike. The media as a whole could do a lot better in making people aware that the majority of accidents that they call lost control are really due to cars pulling out in front of bikes.

+1




(http://www.smokeymountaintrading.com/6cdde670.jpg)
(http://www.smokeymountaintrading.com/6c4d7650.jpg)
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: bIgPrO on September 24, 2007, 06:58:52 PM
That's the full article but it doesn't have the fatality graphic that is in the paper. Thanks for posting the full one. I'm just excited that motorcycle safety is getting press since maybe it will wake some cagers up. If you look at some of the specific Ft. Worth fatalities then I don't see anything about a car running out in front of the bike. The media as a whole could do a lot better in making people aware that the majority of accidents that they call lost control are really due to cars pulling out in front of bikes.

+1




(http://www.smokeymountaintrading.com/6cdde670.jpg)
(http://www.smokeymountaintrading.com/6c4d7650.jpg)


hey I need one of those patches. Where can I find those ???
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: murray_61 on September 24, 2007, 07:33:05 PM
I ordered a bunch of stuff from here:  http://www.smokeymountaintrading.com/  and they came in very quickly.  They even have the Remove before flight banners...  The site was a little tricky, it took me to another site at one point, http://www.4tumbleweed.com but I ordered some stuff from there as well, just gotta see what you want and who has it cheaper, the second site will do custom patches (like name or saying) as well...

and so this can't be considered thread hi-jacking...

Get your helmet law patches at the above websites!

Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: WILD E on September 24, 2007, 07:48:07 PM
Helment or no helment , I bet most of the bikers were killed by cagiers  on cell phones.  :'(
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: snake on September 25, 2007, 07:55:33 AM
Helment or no helment , I bet most of the bikers were killed by cagiers  on cell phones.  :'(
And I bet a cigarette dropped in the lap has killed WAY more than cell phones have, they're just the newest distraction....Stereos, kids in seats, all the other distractions are big contributors too. Not to mention DVD players now.... ;D
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: rbrown on September 25, 2007, 12:32:48 PM
I agree, Snake. I still feel that more motorcycle safety awareness on TV and in newspapers could help wake people up to paying attention on the road. Prosecuting would also wake people up.
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: kenpo chris on September 25, 2007, 12:53:36 PM
I used to wear one with my hayabusa, and now with my vtx I don't.  I like that it's my choice and want it to stay that way.
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: SouthernXer on September 25, 2007, 01:53:54 PM
I think that if you decide not to wear a helmet then you should have to take out an additional insurance policy that will specifically help pay/reimburse whoever has to clean up your blood/brain matter when you do get rolled up.  Otherwise, all of our insurance rates will continue to increase.  Especially with all the squids out there on crotch rockets.  Nothing aggravates me more than seeing a 20 yr old kid in flip flops, Bermuda shorts, and a T-shirt with his girlfriend on the back wearing sandals, shorts, and a tank top blaring down the road on their STUNTAH GSXR.   >:(  Goons, the lot of them.   ;D

Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: rbrown on September 25, 2007, 02:14:45 PM
I choose to wear one all the time but that's my choice. I will say that insurance rates here are almost double what they are in Alabama since they have a helmet law. I'm not sure it is due to less fatalities as a result of everyone wearing a helmet. I still understand a lot of people's desire to make their own choice.
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: crow57 on September 25, 2007, 03:00:04 PM
I'm highly skeptical that insurance rates would drop if everyone wore helmets.  Just not enough of us riding enough miles to add up to that much difference, in the grand scheme of things...  and helmets only giving about a net fatality/injury decrease of about 16% among those that wear them, and about half already wearing them anyway...  It only comes down to only about 0.8% percent reduction of all motor vehicle fatalities/injuries, and I'm sure the ins. cos would have no problem finding a pocket of their own to tuck that into...
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: snake on September 25, 2007, 03:10:27 PM
I personally feel like this;
1.  Just by riding and giving up the safety of a hood out front, doors, seat belts, a trunk in back as a buffer/crunch zone, You have taken the 100% safety of the car( I know I know, but we will use them as the benchmark of safety) and given up about 90% of your survivability quotient already...
2. With 10 percent safety as all you have, Not wearing a helmet shouldn't knock it down anymore than half.
Too many self righteous people swear yes to helmets, but will not even cover their arms from the asphalt in case of a fall.
Too many self righteous people swear yes to leather, then will not wear a helmet to protect their heads
in case of an accident.
Some dress up like power Ranger...I believe this adds back about 5-10 % survivability, for a total of about 20 % as safe as when you were in a car, at best.
I find it ludicrous for people that wear lids and not leather or other PROTECTION (some of the new textiles) to point fingers at helmetless riders who are wearing leather. And the opposite also.
You gave up the BIG percentage just by riding a bike. Why squabble over 5-10 %? You are in the same boat...that is unless you wear power ranger gear AND drive a goldwing WITH an airbag.
Me? I wear a helmet almost religously, maybe ridden 10 miles in the last 35 years or so without. Hard to ever catch me without one. I got ran over by a galaxy 500 in 72', and ground a hole while sliding in gravel through the bubble shield I had on my helmet.  Woulda' been my face otherwise.
I am still pro choice though, wear what you like, I'll ride with ya'!
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: murray_61 on September 25, 2007, 04:26:59 PM
I think that if you decide not to wear a helmet then you should have to take out an additional insurance policy that will specifically help pay/reimburse whoever has to clean up your blood/brain matter when you do get rolled up.  Otherwise, all of our insurance rates will continue to increase.  Especially with all the squids out there on crotch rockets.  Nothing aggravates me more than seeing a 20 yr old kid in flip flops, Bermuda shorts, and a T-shirt with his girlfriend on the back wearing sandals, shorts, and a tank top blaring down the road on their STUNTAH GSXR.   >:(  Goons, the lot of them.   ;D



You do have to have a certain amount of health insurance or PIP protection to not wear a helmet, or take the safety class right?
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: snake on September 25, 2007, 05:13:48 PM
You do have to have a certain amount of health insurance or PIP protection to not wear a helmet, or take the safety class right?
To Legally ride without a helmet, health insurance or a safety class will do the trick, helmetless riders don't have to have either. Only LEGALLY helmetless riders do.
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: rbrown on September 25, 2007, 06:12:31 PM
Snake, I agree. Pro choice is still the answer and I'll ride with anyone whether they wear a lid or not. Like you, I intentionally laid my bike down early on due to a stupid cager and popped my head on the gravel. Had a headache but feel it would have been a lot worse had I not been wearing one.

We all do know the risk when getting on a bike and there is only so much you can do to protect yourself. Safety class is probably more important since it teaches good defensive and driving skills.
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: rod181 on September 26, 2007, 03:52:38 PM
The helmet controversy is something we talk about sometimes at work since I do work at a hospital and some of my coworkers ride and some don’t ride. I have seen what can happen when you do and don’t wear a helmet. On the plus side of wearing a helmet is that it can protect you face and skull. On the negative side is that it can sever your spinal cord. So even working in a hospital some people wear them some don’t. I believe that we are all adults and should have the right to choose but also to face the consequences of our choices. To be honest I saw some stuff that freaked me out this week but the damage was not due to a helmet. All of the damage I saw was on the patient’s body. So if you wear one or you don’t just watch out for those Cagers. When I ride I consider anyone in a car an idiot so try to look out for what mistakes they might commit. So everyone just ride safe and enjoy the ride cause you know there is nothing like it.  O0
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: BigNasdy on September 26, 2007, 04:01:33 PM
I think a hell mitt is nothing more than a device used by lazy Cranberries paramedics, to tote yer brains back to the truck :o...........after all, what good is yer head if it aint attached? ::)
Furthermore,If they dont like the mess :'(.....they should get a job ironing underwear at the local cleaners :-\ ..........
Ifn ya need a hell mitt, just drive yer cage ???....you will be safe there..........
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: DagoRed on September 27, 2007, 02:30:44 PM
I'm a paramedic and I wear a helmet.  I think everyone should.  I also HIGHLY respect a person's right to choose.  After all...isn't that what riding a motorcycle is all about?
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: snake on September 27, 2007, 02:47:50 PM
Snake, I agree. Pro choice is still the answer and I'll ride with anyone whether they wear a lid or not. Like you, I intentionally laid my bike down early on due to a stupid cager and popped my head on the gravel. Had a headache but feel it would have been a lot worse had I not been wearing one.

We all do know the risk when getting on a bike and there is only so much you can do to protect yourself. Safety class is probably more important since it teaches good defensive and driving skills.
Actually, I didn't "lay" it down...the car cut accross my lane while it was turning onto a dirt road to my right...a car was in the oncoming lane the galaxy just left...no room there, just a head on. So I tried to brake and hang the right...slid sideways into the Galaxy, crushed the left knee and artery, lucky I didn't get a hole in the leg...the busted artery "filled up" my leg and kept me from bleeding out. The bike  and I slid on my right leg/arm/helmet to a stop. The pipes then cooked my right leg, trapped under the bike. The sad thing is, that left knee isn't my "bad" knee...tore the right one up playing ball.
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: snake on September 27, 2007, 02:50:34 PM
I'm a paramedic and I wear a helmet.  I think everyone should.  I also HIGHLY respect a person's right to choose.  After all...isn't that what riding a motorcycle is all about?
That is what I believe it is all about. But then again, I'm a democrat so that may not count! ;D
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: snake on September 27, 2007, 02:56:44 PM
I think a hell mitt is nothing more than a device used by lazy Cranberries paramedics, to tote yer brains back to the truck :o...........after all, what good is yer head if it aint attached? ::)
Furthermore,If they dont like the mess :'(.....they should get a job ironing underwear at the local cleaners :-\ ..........
Ifn ya need a hell mitt, just drive yer cage ???....you will be safe there..........

I sure hope you don't ever need one of those lazy Cranberries paramedics D. ;D
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: X-aholic on September 27, 2007, 03:04:05 PM
I think a hell mitt is nothing more than a device used by lazy Cranberries paramedics, to tote yer brains back to the truck :o...........after all, what good is yer head if it aint attached? ::)
Furthermore,If they dont like the mess :'(.....they should get a job ironing underwear at the local cleaners :-\ ..........
Ifn ya need a hell mitt, just drive yer cage ???....you will be safe there..........

so, your for or against helmets? ??? ;D ;)
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: crow57 on September 27, 2007, 03:54:05 PM
Actually, I didn't "lay" it down...the car cut accross my lane while it was turning onto a dirt road to my right...a car was in the oncoming lane the galaxy just left...no room there, just a head on. So I tried to brake and hang the right...slid sideways into the Galaxy, crushed the left knee and artery, lucky I didn't get a hole in the leg...the busted artery "filled up" my leg and kept me from bleeding out. The bike  and I slid on my right leg/arm/helmet to a stop. The pipes then cooked my right leg, trapped under the bike. The sad thing is, that left knee isn't my "bad" knee...tore the right one up playing ball.

Cool horror story there, Snake...  I got broadsided by a car in '79.  I realized I was gonna get hit with no time left to avoid it, I instinctivley grabbed all the throttle in a futile effort to escape his path, and (also instinctively) yanked my right leg up out of the way.  The seat height (Honda 550) was slightly above the top of his car hood, it just swatted the bike out from under my Cranberries, my forward momentum got my body out of the way before his windshield arrived.  The bike heading south with my left leg still draped over it spun me over and around, I contacted the road with my back/shoulders, did half a somersault and landed on my feet.  Not a scratch on me, leather jacket a little scuffed, minor scratches on helmet, bike totaled, underwear clean (it happened too fast to get scared).
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: BigNasdy on September 27, 2007, 04:43:59 PM
Im pro choice for hell mitts, I do like mine when winter rars its ugly head.....
and I do know alot of parameds, including some good bros here..... ;)
just have to mess with em, and I hope Im beyond them when the time comes...................THATS what riding is about............WE ARE ALL doomed, its just a matter of time if you ride..........some folks sooner than others............
God Bless, Ride safe
d
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: rbrown on September 27, 2007, 05:00:31 PM
Bare, your's was a lot worse than mine but a cager forced me to lay mine down, as well.

As far as your policital persuasion, I would think you would want government to buy everyone a helmet so you could raise taxes to pay for it. ;D
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: hipshot on September 27, 2007, 07:29:48 PM
Crow, you're absolutely right about premiums -- the insurance industry will always find a way to take more, but will never give part of it back.

I always wear a helmet, but I also feel that armor is an important accessory. A head injury is more likely to be fatal or crippling than a road rash (I once saw a road rash run right through a guy's ribs -- his guts were hanging out. He had slid on the concrete with his HD on top of him. But where his head had been looked a lot worse than his torso). I think riding without a helmet is foolish, but I don't think it should be mandated. I do ride without armor frequently in the summer. I'm surprised the insurance industry hasn't started penalizing us for not using helmets.
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: BigNasdy on September 27, 2007, 08:45:43 PM
yepp.............gutts iz gutts..........
d
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: rbrown on September 27, 2007, 08:59:15 PM
Y'all are right. Insurance companies will never reduce our premiums to that of other states even if everyone wore a helmet. If they could just come out with cool, lightweight Kevlar then more might wear even armor.
Title: Re: Helmet article in FW Star Telegram Monday, Sep 24 Edition
Post by: Morgan Buchanan on October 01, 2007, 01:11:59 PM
I hate it when they puke out statistics that are meaningless like showing the overall deaths number and the number of helmeted deaths, like that MEANS something.  It's worthless trivia without data that gives us some idea of what percentage are wearing helmets and so on.

That doesn't mean I don't wear a helmet - I do.  I just don't care if you choose to not do so.

I hate posts in a colloquial vernacular.  Now THERE would be a good law!  LOL
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal